
Is cultural appropriation the only problem?
The world premiere of Mercedes-Benz's electric C-Class became a hot topic. The reason was the stage, not the car. At the event unveiling the new electric vehicle, street food stalls, karaoke rooms, neon signs, and Korean-style street scenes were featured. From an international perspective, Korean nightlife and street food stalls may have appeared as exotic and stylish scenes. However, from a Korean perspective, it felt awkward. This is because the sight of a Mercedes-Benz parked in front of a neighborhood street food stall does not appear particularly hip or an object of envy. While it might be a distinctly Korean scene to some, to Koreans, it was simply a familiar part of everyday life.
This phenomenon can also be linked to cultural appropriation. Cultural appropriation refers to a situation where a group with greater power or influence appropriates or commercially consumes the symbols, styles, traditions, and modes of expression from another culture without understanding the context. However, it is difficult to view this case solely as cultural appropriation. The key point lies not in the fact that Korean culture was used, but in the fact that those cultural elements were not properly connected to explain the Mercedes-Benz brand and the electric C-Class product.
Looking solely at the keywords, it is not a bad idea. It is common for luxury brands to draw on a rugged street style or casual culture. Korean culture also enjoys high global recognition. Elements such as Hangeul signboards, nightlife, food culture, and neon signs leave a strong visual impression. If the electric C-Class intended to emphasize a younger and more casual vibe than existing flagship sedans, there was room to utilize these elements. The problem lies in the fact that good ingredients did not translate into good scenes.

A stage where the background has become larger than the protagonist
The biggest problem with this presentation was the stage production. Mercedes-Benz is a brand that has long championed the design philosophy of "sensual purity." For a new car launch, the proportions, front end, interior display, lighting, and electrification technology of the electric C-Class should have been at the center. However, at the venue, background elements such as street food stalls, karaoke signs, and neon lights were more prominent. The stage, meant to explain the car, told more stories than the vehicle itself, diverting attention away from the product.
When the background becomes larger than the protagonist, cognitive dissonance arises. The audience ends up thinking, "Why is a Mercedes-Benz at a street food stall?" before thinking, "What kind of car is the new electric C-Class?" The Korean cultural element became an image that dominated the entire event, rather than a supporting device for the brand and product. Had there been a strong narrative connecting the car and the street food stall, the outcome might have been different. For instance, the concept would have been persuasive if there had been clear links such as Korean night streets, urban mobility, electrification in daily life, or the lifestyle of the new generation. However, on this stage, sensory purity, electric vehicles, street food stalls, karaoke, and golf bags were scattered in different directions.
The visual direction also left much to be desired. The charm of Korean night streets stems from the light of signs spreading in the darkness, the density of the alleys, and the warmth between people. However, the strong lighting and set design used for the new car launch failed to capture this atmosphere. Consequently, neither the Korean night streets appeared sufficiently beautiful, nor did the car look luxurious. Scenes such as pouring drinks like a bartender at a street stall or taking out a golf bag in front of one further weakened the continuity of the concept. Rather than scenes that were both distinctly Korean and Mercedes-Benz, they gave the impression of disparate images being forcibly placed in the same space.

The real problem is the quality of the direction
This incident cannot be explained solely by the discrepancy between how foreigners view Korea and how Koreans view it. The bigger issue was the quality of the message design and direction. It would have been safe to simply repeat existing conventions of luxury. Had they used high-end hotels, minimal lighting, a refined stage, and slow camerawork, there might have been less controversy. However, it would have been difficult to stand out. In that sense, Mercedes-Benz's attempt to create a new scene by utilizing Korean culture was not bad in itself.
However, the connection between elements is even more crucial for new endeavors. When utilizing local culture, one must not stop at simply bringing in easily recognizable symbols. A design is required that explains why this location is the right place, why this culture connects with this car, and why this brand can speak to this scene. In this presentation, those connections were weak. While Korean culture was strongly evident, Mercedes-Benz's design philosophy and the marketability of the electric C-Class were not sufficiently showcased. Consequently, the concept felt crude rather than bold.
The potential of the concept is also visible in other promotional videos and images. Had the Korean nightlife, urban mobility, the sensibilities of the younger generation, and the quiet driving experience of an electric vehicle been effectively woven together, it could have been a sufficiently attractive campaign. The problem is that this potential was not convincingly realized on the most important stage of the world premiere. If the intention was to respect the culture and utilize it as the protagonist, more detailed research and interpretation were required. Local culture is not mere decoration; it is context. If that context cannot be translated into the brand's language, the strongest material can become the biggest obstacle.